|
|
|
Articles Agricultural LawBusiness Law Civil Litigation Dairy Update Employment Law Estate Planning Family Law Firm News Health Law Immigration Law Insurance Law Oil & Gas Law Real Estate Law School Law Tax Law Wind Energy |
Proposed Final Rule Changes for No-Match Letters Friday, October 5, 2007 Effective September 14, 2007, the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") and the Immigration Customs Enforcement ("ICE") will follow new rules concerning "Employer Correction Requests," also known as "No-Match Letters." There are two events that trigger the application of the new rules. The first event is referred to as a No-Match Letter. In this event, the employer receives a written notice from the Social Security Administration ("SSA") stating that the combination of name and social security number submitted to SSA for an employee does not match agency records. The second event is referred to as a Wrongful Assignment Letter. Here, the employer receives written notice from DHS that the immigration status or employment-authorization documentation presented or referenced by the employee in completing Form I-9 ("I-9") was not assigned to the employee according to DHS records. In addition, the new rules outline a series of "safe-harbor" procedures. Employers can follow these procedures in response to a No-Match Letter or a Wrongful Assignment Letter from DHS. These procedures are located at 8 C.F.R. sec. 274a.1(l)(2)(i) (2007). Safe Harbor Procedures: The following procedures are very important to note. Should an employer receive either one of the two letters, then the employer should follow the outlined procedures. If the employer chooses to follow the safe harbor procedures, then the receipt of the letter will not be used as evidence by DHS of constructive knowledge. Should an employer have constructive knowledge, then the employer will be in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act of "knowingly" employing an unauthorized alien. A. No-Match Letter If an employer receives a No-Match Letter, there are safe harbor procedures it should follow. First, the employer must check its records to determine whether the discrepancy results from a typographical, transcription, or similar clerical error.
Second, if the employer determines the discrepancy is not due to an error in its own records, it must promptly request that the employee confirm that the name and social security number in the employer's records are correct. If the employee states the employer's records are incorrect, the employer must correct, inform, verify, and make a record as set forth above. In other words, follow the same steps as if there were a typographical, transcription, or similar clerical error. If the employee confirms the employer's records are correct:
Third, if the employer is unable to verify with SSA within ninety days of receiving the written notice that the employee's name and social security number match SSA's records, the employer must again verify the employee's employment authorization and identity within an additional three days by following a verification procedure. Under that verification procedure, the employer completes a new I-9 for the employee, using the same procedures as if the employee were newly hired, and the employer must retain the new I-9 with the prior I-9, except that:
B. Wrongful Assignment Letter If an employer receives a Wrongful Assignment Letter, there are safe harbor provisions it should follow. First, the employer must contact the local DHS office (in accordance with the written notice's instructions, if any) and attempt to resolve the question raised by DHS. The employer must complete this step within thirty days of receiving the written notice. Second, if the employer is unable to verify with DHS within ninety days of receiving the written notice that the immigration status document or employment authorization document is assigned to the employee, the employer must again verify the employee's employment authorization and identity within an additional three days by following a verification procedure. Under this verification procedure, the employer completes a new I-9 for the employee, using the same procedures as if the employee were newly hired, and the employer must retain the new I-9 with the prior I-9, except that:
Non-Discrimination Provision: The non-discrimination provision is very important for the employer. To begin with, the provision applies to both No-Match Letters and Wrongful Assignment Letters. Next, employers should follow the provisions set out by the new rule in order to avoid a discrimination claim by an employee. In addition, employers should follow the same procedure for all employees. As stated in the regulations, "knowledge that an employee is unauthorized may not be inferred from an employee's foreign appearance or accent." 8 C.F.R. sec. 274a.1(l)(2)(i) (2007). This column is published for informational purposes only. It should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to create an attorney client relationship. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the author's law firm or its individual partners. |
| Nothing contained in this website is intended to provide either general or specific legal advice. Underwood's attorneys are licensed to practice only in the State of Texas. Nothing contained in this website is intended to constitute the giving of legal advice or the practice of law in any state in which Underwood's attorneys are not licensed to practice. Unless specifically noted in their biographies or in Underwood's section profiles, its attorneys are not board certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. | |